Typhoon withdrawn from Canadian fighter competition

AvatarBy Chris Thatcher | August 30, 2019

Estimated reading time 5 minutes, 2 seconds.

And then there were three. Airbus Defence and Space has withdrawn the Eurofighter Typhoon from the competition to replace the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) fighter fleet of CF-188 Hornets.

Reports of Airbus' consideration of withdrawing from the Future Fighter Capability Project have circulated since July. Italian Air Force Photo
Reports of Airbus’ consideration of withdrawing from the Future Fighter Capability Project have circulated since July. Italian Air Force Photo

Airbus and the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence informed the Canadian government on Aug. 30 following a “detailed review of the request for proposal (RFP)” issued on July 23, Airbus said in a statement.

The company cited two factors that prompted the decision to withdraw following reviews of both the draft RFPs and the final document.

“First, a detailed review has led the parties to conclude that NORAD security requirements continue to place too significant of a cost on platforms whose manufacture and repair chains sit outside the United States-Canada 2-EYES community.”

The second concern was the fact that “the significant recent revision of industrial technological benefits (ITB) obligations does not sufficiently value the binding commitments the Typhoon Canada package was willing to make, and which were one of its major points of focus.”

Both the U.K. MoD and Airbus Defence and Space acknowledged the complexity of the project and thanked the future Fighter Capability Project Office for its “commitment to transparency” and “the thoroughly professional nature of the competition.”

Despite the decision, Airbus reiterated its commitment to Canadian aerospace and defence programs. The company is in the process of delivering the first of 16 fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft, the CC-295, that will replace the CC-115 Buffalo and CC-130H Hercules, and is positioned for the RCAF’s Future Aircrew Training Program.

“Airbus Defence and Space is proud of our longstanding partnership with the government of Canada, and of serving our fifth home country’s aerospace priorities for over three decades,” said Simon Jacques, president of Airbus Defence and Space Canada, in a statement. “Together we continue in our focus of supporting the men and women of the Canadian Armed Forces, growing skilled aerospace jobs across the country and spurring innovation in the Canadian aerospace sector.”

The departure of the Typhoon leaves three of the original five qualified aircraft in the running to provide 88 new fighter jets: The Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II, the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, and the Saab JAS 39 Gripen E. Proposals must be submitted by spring 2020 and a contract is expected in 2022.

Dassault Aviation informed the Government on Nov. 8, 2018, that it was withdrawing the Rafale from the competition, citing concerns about meeting Canadian requirements for interoperability with U.S. forces.

While the Airbus decision was not a surprise to some who have been following the Future Fighter Capability Project — the company went public with its concerns regarding late changes to the ITB evaluation process that allowed the F-35 to compete — the withdrawal of the Typhoon could be a worry for government officials hoping to have a European jet among the eventual bidders.

“Of the original three European competitors, Airbus with the Eurofighter flying in the U.K. [was] the closest to the level of interoperability the RCAF needs for the next fighter,” said David Perry, vice-president and senior analyst with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, noting the Typhoon operates within the Five-Eyes intelligence network of the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

“There was a hope that because they had cracked the Five-Eyes code … they would be able to provide a solution that would be Two-Eyes (U.S. and Canada) compliant. The fact that they withdrew and cited that specifically might cause a bit of concern,” he said.

Whether that requirement also deters Saab remains to be seen. The company continues to express interest in the project and the Gripen C/D variant operated by the Swedish, Hungarian and Czech air forces works regularly with U.S. fighters in NATO operations and exercises.

Perry noted that Saab “will have to work through a lot of challenges to be able to put forward a proposal that does meet that Two-Eyes level of interoperability” that the Canadian government will be seeking.

“[For] the right reasons, the government wants to be assured that you can make that work,” he said. “It is definitely a disadvantage if you don’t start inside the [Two-Eyes] tent.”

Notice a spelling mistake or typo?

Click on the button below to send an email to our team and we will get to it as soon as possible.

Report an error or typo

Have a story idea you would like to suggest?

Click on the button below to send an email to our team and we will get to it as soon as possible.

Suggest a story

Join the Conversation

  1. Avatar
  2. Avatar
  3. Avatar
  4. Avatar
  5. Avatar
  6. Avatar


  1. This is a pity that the Eurofighter is not in the race.

    Single engine intercepors are not a adequate for the Canadian airspace.
    So, I really think that Canada should not go for the F35 as it is a single engine aircraft and is not as good as an interceptor as the Dassault Rafales. The Super Hornet is a very old technology. This also makes the SAAB unsuitable.

    I think that Canada should make sure that the race is between the F22, Rafales and Eurofighter. The Rafale is a good solution since it can operate five Neuron fighter drones multiplying the interception capacity at levels that the other airplanes are not capable of.

  2. Two engines is not a RCAF Requirement. In any event, jet engine technology and reliability have come a long way since the CF-18’s F404 engines were developed over 45 years ago. Besides, the USAF han’t lost a single engined F-16 due to engine failure since the 1990s. Now that the F-35 has completed its’ development and is entering full rate production, the cost per copy is approaching $75 Million which is cheaper than the Super Hornet and way cheaper than the Eurofighter Typhoon would have been.

    1. Woa! Hold Your Horses, Who Authorized Full Scale Production?

      The Pentagons Director of Operational Test & Evaluations running the test to determine if it will enter full production & have been clear it’s a long, long way from having full development. In fact they called out the three services who’ve bought the F-35 for running crooked IOC testing.

      The $75 mill price tag’s unproven & Boeings dropped their price on the Super Hornets & Growlers by $10 mil.

      I think that the DOT&E’s evaluation that’s due for release next year will have a big affect on the Canadian Competition, the competition shouldn’t be completed till it’s released & the necessity of having a mixed fleet may become self apparent. Otherwise we’ll be forced to maintain a Light Attack Turbo Prop or Fighter Jet Fleet that’s a variant of our trainers like the AT-6 Wolverine turbo prop.

  3. I vote get rid of trudy before he boondoggles another 1/2 billion away like his pals did with the Cormorants and then bought them anyway.
    These clowns should not be in charge of this procurement. Please leave this to the Military specialists we employ called the the RCAF!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *