Canada seeking qualified bidders for Polaris replacement

AvatarBy Chris Thatcher | February 16, 2021

Estimated reading time 7 minutes, 45 seconds.

The Canadian government is inviting aerospace and other interested companies to qualify for the Strategic Tanker Transport Capability (STTC) project. 

Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) posted the notice on the government Buy and Sell website Feb. 12 as a first step in a three-phase procurement process to replace the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) CC-150 Polaris strategic airlift fleet.

The RCAF is looking to replace its CC-150 Polaris aircraft with a multi-role platform that can be configured for air-to-air refueling, personnel airlift, strategic government transport, aeromedical evacuations and freight movement. Galen Burrows Photo

The invitation to qualify (ITQ), which closes on Feb. 26, is intended to identify respondents able to meet the project’s security and other core requirements before moving to the tender phase. Once a qualified suppliers list is established, Procurement Canada and the Air Force will then review and refine the project requirements with companies before developing a draft request for proposal (RFP), to be issued by fall 2021. 

The review phase “is intended to be a collaborative process and may involve interactions such as workshops, one-on-one sessions (commercially confidential meetings), and written questions and answers,” according to the ITQ documents. “Canada will consider the feedback provided by qualified suppliers.” 

A formal RFP, the third phase, is expected by late 2021 or early 2022.

While the process means only qualified suppliers will be invited to submit bids, the government “reserves the right . . . to re-evaluate any aspect of the qualification of any Qualified Supplier at any time during the aircraft procurement process and change their status to ‘unqualified’ if they no longer meet the requirements provided in this ITQ,” according to the document. In addition, “Canada may, at its sole discretion, re-open Phase 1 – ITQ.” 

The RCAF is seeking a multi-role platform that can be configured for air-to-air refueling, personnel airlift, strategic government transport, aeromedical evacuations and freight movement, among other roles. The aircraft may also be used to support disaster relief, search-and-rescue and contributions to peace operations; it must also include the capacity to detect, avoid and defeat air-to-air and air-to-ground threats. In its tanker role, the aircraft must be able to refuel allied fighter jets on NATO and NORAD operations. 

Though the ITQ does not specify a quantity, the fleet must be large enough to concurrently provide support to three lines of tasking of “unrestricted global air mobility movements” over a 24-hour period.

The STTC project was outlined in the Liberal government’s June 2017 defense policy as initiative 47 to recapitalize strategic tanking and airlift with a next generation platform to replace the CC-150. The Polaris is a modified variant of the Airbus A310-300 built in the late 1980s, and operated by 437 Transport Squadron at 8 Wing Trenton, Ontario. A fleet of five was acquired in 1992 from Canadian Airlines, and two were converted to tankers in 2008. 

While the two CC-150Ts have been providing air-to-air refueling globally (their crucial role alongside other coalition tankers in the fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria was highlighted in a recent RAND research brief), they only recently received full operational capability to conduct mid-air refueling on NORAD operations — a role that had previously only been done by the CC-130H Hercules tankers operated by 435 Transport and Rescue Squadron from 17 Wing Winnipeg, Manitoba, and U.S. Air Force aircraft.

Boeing and Airbus have indicated interest in the program. Boeing is offering the KC-46 Pegasus, a militarized variant of the 767 widebody, while Airbus is promoting the A330 multirole tanker transport (MRTT), a variant of the A330-200 airframe. CBC has reported the government may also be assessing “whether any deal can be found among commercial airlines that are currently looking for financial relief from Ottawa,” including Air Canada. 

“We look forward to working with the government of Canada and engaging in [the] Strategic Tanker Transport Capability project,” Boeing Defense, Space & Security said in a statement. “Boeing’s KC-46A is a wide-body, multi-role tanker, and is already certified to refuel Canadian, allied and coalition military aircraft. In addition to serving as an aerial refueling tanker, the KC-46 can be configured to accommodate cargo, passengers, or to serve as an aero-medical evacuation aircraft or any combination of all three. . . . The KC-46 offers superior interoperability, supportability and affordability benefits – coupled with a robust industry plan that will bring real, guaranteed jobs to companies all across Canada. With 183 aircraft on order and growing international interest, we expect the fleet to surpass 200 aircraft by 2029.”

“We welcome Canada’s invitation to qualify for the Strategic Tanker Transport Capability project,” said Simon Jacques, president of Airbus Defence and Space Canada, in a statement. “We believe that our A330 MRTT multirole-tanker is the best option in the market, and are confident that our offer will fulfill all current and future requirements for this key capability for the RCAF.”

Prospective bidders will be expected to provide aircrew and maintenance training programs, and establish initial sustainment and long-term in-service support “that assures operational readiness and maintains mission effectiveness of the capability throughout its service life,” according to the ITQ.

As part of the STTC project, the Air Force will improve infrastructure for 437 Squadron. In December, the government released an advanced procurement notice for a new or renovated hangar at the main operating base in Trenton, as well as upgrades to the apron and taxiways. A request for proposals is expected by summer 2021.

Contenders will also have to comply with Canada’s Industrial and Technological Benefits policy, which requires the successful bidder to make investments in Canadian industry and academic research equal to the value of the contract. With STTC, the government will be seeking investments that align with key industrial capabilities, including aerospace systems, systems integration, in-service support and training and simulation. 

Notice a spelling mistake or typo?

Click on the button below to send an email to our team and we will get to it as soon as possible.

Report an error or typo

Have a story idea you would like to suggest?

Click on the button below to send an email to our team and we will get to it as soon as possible.

Suggest a story

Join the Conversation

  1. Avatar
  2. Avatar
  3. Avatar
  4. Avatar


  1. There are two types out there. A330 and B767. Just pick one!!! Procurement for the CF is a complete joke! Has been since the 60’s. I’m also curious how you use a tanker for SAR missions? Don’t get me wrong, I love and support our military. I just can’t stand the government’s way of procurement.

    1. Well the procurement process is all about being fair, transparent, and representing the best value for Canada. Saying “just pick one” is fine when purchasing a small amount of office supplies, but a complex military procurement representing billions of taxpayer dollars must be thoroughly vetted. The sponsorship scandal of the 1990s demonstrates the fallacy of sole source contracts when there is isn’t sufficient oversight and a thorough procurement process in place. We have the time and we are going to own these planes for the next 30+ years. We owe it to the men and women who will use this equipment to get it right.

      As a side note, don’t forget that Canada is obligated to follow international trade obligations regarding government acquisitions. These are legally binding procurement regulations that Canada can’t simply ignore out of convenience. This goes for other countries too of course.

      1. James I understand where you’re coming from however to say “we owe it to the men and women who use the equipment to get it right” I feel is more of an emotional statement. Let’s review a few purchases.
        LAVW light utility trucks with the metal on metal brake system. Could hear the army coming for miles.
        HMCS ​Chicoutimi. One sailor died from a fire on board while sub was in transit from the UK. The Brits even said these were going to the scrap yard.
        Ch 146 griffon. Replaced the Twin Huey, Kiowa and Chinook. Smooth and quieter than a twin Huey but lacks power. And let’s be honest here. How do you replace a chinook with a griffon.
        The SARFW procurement started in 2012. Its 2021 and we just received our first aircraft.
        James like I said I understand where you’re coming but are we getting it right? I really don’t think so and there needs to be a change in the procurement system.
        Just in case you’re wondering between myself and the rest of my family, there is well over 100 years of service to our country so I’m not talking out of my bum. Cheers!

  2. I completely agree Mike. This boondoggle has been going on since the 1960’s, if I’m not mistaken. After joining the RCAF in the early 1960’s I got the dubious pleasure of flying several of the governments time expired aircraft. We could do worse than take a hard look at the Austrian Airforce and it procurement method. The RAAF always seem to have a timely turnover to modern equipment. Whereas, Canada has to accept their “hand me downs”.

  3. Boeing was disqualified from this procurement and for good reason! Look at the quality, cost and schedule issues for the USAF for the KC-47! It’s going to be sole source and Airbus will win this. It’s a better tanker! Even the USAF selected it before Boeing complained and the politics came into play. Also Boeing miscalculated with tariffs on C Series! How they forgot that governments are important customers is really is beyond unwise! Boeing will not win any major contracts from government of Canada anytime soon. Gripen will be our next fighter too! Boeing use to be a good engineering company but that is no longer true.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *